Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 81% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X79 (all builds)
Memory	24.8 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140506
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '18 at 09:26
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3960X-$265 2,165 User benchmarks, average bench 78% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Memory 88.5 1-Core 113 2-Core 221 80% 141 Pts	4-Core 416 8-Core 601 64% 508 Pts	64-Core 730 45% 730 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6288) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Lighting 148 Reflection 150 Parallax 128 121% 142 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 142 Splatting 112 100% 123 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80 4,893 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 184GB free Firmware: 2.06 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 84 84 974968150499 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 28698971471898 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 85 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 35 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 129 545469300864 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 974968150499 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 974968150499 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 974968150499 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 140067473457252 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 202 (EA) Unknown 0 0 302 (F1) Unknown 0 0 302 (F2) Unknown 0 0 141	54.7% Above average	Read 269 Write 231 Mixed 248 56% 249 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 37.9 4K Mixed 15.6 72% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 88.8 94% 154 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 91%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$65 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3030 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1060 (B1) Unknown 97 97 27 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 56 42 44 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 194 (EB) Unknown 99 99 193 (F1) Unknown 99 99 19866976412	78.4% Very good	Read 508 Write 354 Mixed 353 90% 405 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 51.8 4K Mixed 18.5 93% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 76.4 90% 159 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Series 500GB 7,390 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 49GB free Firmware: DXT0AB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3437 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1504 (B1) Unknown 99 99 10 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 58 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 195 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7419873724	70% Good	Read 488 Write 303 Mixed 288 79% 360 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 51.6 4K Mixed 13.9 76% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 257 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 37.3 77% 159 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 89%
WD WD30EZRS-00J99B0 3TB 2,807 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 168 144 8600 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4221 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6825 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1638 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 299 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 193 193 23408 (C2) HDA temperature 118 90 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	64.6% Good	Read 110 Write 115 Mixed 111 84% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.21 90% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1333 CL9-9-9 D3-1333 CL9-9-9 D3-1333 CL9-9-9 D3-1333 28GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	82.7% Excellent	MC Read 34.4 MC Write 30.3 MC Mixed 30.4 91% 31.7 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 12.8 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,806 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $195Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	446x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	389x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	300x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	107x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	105x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	102x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	77x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	64x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	63x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	31x
Dominator DHX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 73%, 416 samples	21x
Vengeance DDR3 1866 4x8GBCorsairBench 88%, 441 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $723

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16