HP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory2.7 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110802
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMar 24 '16 at 13:15
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B95
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 84.2
1-Core 43.2
2-Core 83.9
47% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 173
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6350
HP(103C 2126) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.2% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 2.04
Parallax 1.66
1% 1.69 fps
MRender 2.05
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 2
1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.2%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$65
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.3% Good
Read 265
Write 233
Mixed 251
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 64.6
4K Mixed 21.8
101% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 54.6
64% 110 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 41GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
32.9% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 12
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback