Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory61.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150930
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '16 at 13:13
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 93.4
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 781
75% 621 Pts
64-Core 958
59% 958 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5891
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Lighting 71.3
Reflection 71.2
Parallax 62.2
58% 68.3 fps
MRender 75
Gravity 65.5
Splatting 56.7
53% 65.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 2,268
Write 1,463
Mixed 1,599
393% 1,777 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 22.7
128% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 29.4
DQ Write 96.8
DQ Mixed 141
85% 89 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 220%
Great: 283%
Inateck ASM1153E 8TB
792GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 105
Write 114
Mixed 75.9
125% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.38
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 0.58
423% 4.55 MB/s
DQ Read 1.39
DQ Write 11.2
DQ Mixed 0.22
393% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 45
MC Write 44.1
MC Mixed 45.5
128% 44.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 24.3
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 61.1
65% 61.1 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 116%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback