Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T7400  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0RW199
Memory17.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 0.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '18 at 06:38
Run Duration381 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5472
CPU, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 43.1
2-Core 86
42% 65.5 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 339
30% 254 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
PwrHis(1787 2266) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
8.74% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 9.42
Parallax 8.16
9% 9.59 fps
MRender 7.95
Gravity 7.67
Splatting 12.5
8% 9.37 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.74%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sata SSD 120GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 91.2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.5% Below average
Read 133
Write 129
Mixed 131
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 8.02
63% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 22.2
DQ Write 33.1
DQ Mixed 8.12
12% 21.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS722525VLSA80 250GB
466GB free
Firmware: A6MA
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 113
Write 104
Mixed 108
82% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 3.71
4K Mixed 0.6
167% 1.69 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 32%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
531GB free
Firmware: L
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60% Good
Read 114
Write 94.9
Mixed 108
80% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 3.08
4K Mixed 0.66
162% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 60%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HDS72102 250GB
232GB free
Firmware: A39C
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 114
Write 57.9
Mixed 75.3
62% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.39
94% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 70%
Seagate BACKUP+ 160GB
30GB free
Firmware: 0304
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 20.9
Mixed 26.6
20% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 0.73
4K Mixed 0.34
73% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15%
Great: 49%
hp v165p 16GB
12GB free, PID 5307
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
6.56% Terrible
Read 27.6
Write 6.26
Mixed 9.26
14% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.02
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.005
19% 1.68 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.56%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.4% Poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.5
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T7400 Builds (Compare 206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback