Openstack Nova

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemOpenstack Nova  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 05 '18 at 23:01
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User BOL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Core (Haswell, no TSX)
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
41.4% Average
Memory 57.5
1-Core 82.6
2-Core 160
56% 100 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 157
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Canonica PVStorage 54GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.9% Good
Read 208
Write 3.93
Mixed 8.97
53% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.87
4K Write 0.05
4K Mixed 0.09
172% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM RAM
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
42.5% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 14
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 13.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nova Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO

System: Openstack Nova

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $700
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback