Medion Akoya P5330 E MD8876/2459

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion Akoya P5330 E MD8876/2459  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H110H4-EM
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '18 at 20:41
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6402P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 197
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 297
41% 302 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.5% Above average
Lighting 71
Reflection 72.8
Parallax 63.6
58% 69.1 fps
MRender 72.2
Gravity 68.9
Splatting 67.9
57% 69.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
163GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 506
Write 246
Mixed 306
78% 352 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 26.5
121% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 66
98% 185 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 128%
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-00000 128GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT2100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB Corsair CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
71.5% Very good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 22.7
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 22.1
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Akoya P5330 E MD8876/2459 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Medion Akoya P5330 E MD8876/2459

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback