Medion Akoya P5330 E MD8876/2459

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion Akoya P5330 E MD8876/2459  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H110H4-EM
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '18 at 19:55
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 44%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6402P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 99
2-Core 198
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 339
45% 339 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.1% Above average
Lighting 73.5
Reflection 74.8
Parallax 63.8
60% 70.7 fps
MRender 70.4
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 70.8
57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
148GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 394
Mixed 414
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 42.4
153% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 118
132% 224 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 104%
Great: 128%
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-00000 128GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT2100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB Corsair CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.3% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 22.5
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 21
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Akoya P5330 E MD8876/2459 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Medion Akoya P5330 E MD8876/2459

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback