User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardSupermicro X8DAH
Memory20.8 GB free of 24.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '18 at 06:29
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5687
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 58.1
2-Core 105
49% 77.9 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 460
50% 395 Pts
64-Core 783
48% 783 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4997) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.4% Below average
Lighting 51.4
Reflection 81.8
Parallax 110
42% 80.9 fps
MRender 30.1
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 34.8
29% 34.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M6e PCIe 128GB-$93
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 708
Write 330
Mixed 423
107% 487 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 26.6
91% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 65.9
77% 132 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: HP33
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 191
Mixed 160
134% 179 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.3
96% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG MXIC 25L3205 60GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 23
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 19.3
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.9
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback