ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	68% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	93.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Supermicro X8DAH
Memory	20.4 GB free of 24.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100312
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 21 '18 at 20:58
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5687 695 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	81% Excellent	Memory 93.9 1-Core 95 2-Core 190 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 368 8-Core 592 59% 480 Pts	64-Core 956 59% 956 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4997) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	68% Good	Lighting 97 Reflection 91 Parallax 81.2 79% 89.7 fps	MRender 35.1 Gravity 79.7 Splatting 54.7 46% 56.5 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor M6e PCIe 128GB-$93 664 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2376 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 179 (B1) Unknown 100 100 617653 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 49 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 312903 (F2) Unknown 100 100 23771	93.4% Outstanding	Read 736 Write 331 Mixed 430 110% 499 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 63.4 4K Mixed 32.5 109% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 77.4 97% 173 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: HP33 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 99 3088176 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1621 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 88 60 723267099 (09) Power-on hours count 67 67 29059 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 203 (B4) Unknown 100 100 582636056 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 96 96 4 (BE) vendor-specific 65 52 588513315 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 76 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 17969 (C2) HDA temperature 35 48 47244640291 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	96.3% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 157 Mixed 92.6 106% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.33 96% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG MXIC 25L3205 60GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	MC Read 23.6 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 20.1 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.3 22% 7.87 GB/s	Latency 60 67% 60 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback