bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '18 at 21:12
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 95%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31230
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.8% Above average
Memory 63.4
1-Core 74.7
2-Core 153
55% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 286
39% 289 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 2GB
Driver: vm3dum64.dll Ver. 8.15.1.50
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
4.72% Terrible
Lighting 5.83
Reflection 5.38
Parallax 6.84
5% 6.02 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 6.13
Splatting 6.09
5% 5.58 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.72%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 107GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.4% Average
Read 264
Write 255
Mixed 258
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 24.7
4K Mixed 12.4
49% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 56.6
DQ Write 48
DQ Mixed 26
27% 43.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.3
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 11.8
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback