Virtuozzo KVM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVirtuozzo KVM  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory25.2 GB free of 28 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMay 31 '18 at 07:06
Run Duration74 Seconds
Run User EUR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core 2 Duo P9xxx (Penryn Class Core 2)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.8% Below average
Memory 57.8
1-Core 27.7
2-Core 57.3
32% 47.6 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 201
20% 160 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 45%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu Vz HARDDISK0 215GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+ Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.6% Average
Read 577
Write 234
Mixed 326
83% 379 MB/s
4K Read 8.32
4K Write 9.88
4K Mixed 8.09
28% 8.77 MB/s
DQ Read 74.4
DQ Write 38.3
DQ Mixed 30
29% 47.6 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Virtuozzo 28GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 12288 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.5 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 0.8
4% 1.4 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback