Dell Latitude E7440

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemDell Latitude E7440  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 07F3F4
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '18 at 12:42
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 80.1
1-Core 51
2-Core 98.9
50% 76.7 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 134
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 135
8% 135 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Dell(1028 05CB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4432
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
0.69% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 1.22
0% 1.04 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.69%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SB8U-512G-100 512GB
272GB free
Firmware: X412 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.7% Above average
Read 445
Write 257
Mixed 272
72% 325 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 20.7
4K Mixed 9.49
50% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 37.1
51% 95.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 76%
SK hynix SH920 mSAA 256GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 473
Write 309
Mixed 384
86% 389 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 15.5
61% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 54.6
65% 112 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G3S160BM.C16FND 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 15
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E7440 Builds (Compare 1,978 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E7440

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback