Asus P5Q3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5Q3  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100310
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 27 '18 at 12:14
Run Duration403 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
40.9% Average
Memory 68
1-Core 38.7
2-Core 71.9
40% 59.5 Pts
4-Core 85.1
8-Core 71
11% 78.1 Pts
64-Core 84.1
5% 84.1 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X1650
Device(17AF 2068) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
0.59% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 2.04
Parallax 0.53
1% 1.22 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.59%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.03E02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
42% Average
Read 69.1
Write 76.9
Mixed 74.5
56% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.38
96% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42%
Great: 55%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 8GB
6GB free, PID null
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.92% Terrible
Read 17.7
Write 4.3
Mixed 6.04
9% 9.36 MB/s
4K Read 1.65
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.06
8% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.92%
Great: 12%
SAMSUNG GT-S6500 2GB
0GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18% Very poor
Read 15.3
Write 6.85
Mixed 13.1
14% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.64
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 2.94
263% 3.96 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 18%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.7
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q3 Builds (Compare 115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback