Asus P7P55D-E LX

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D-E LX (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20120927
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 25 '18 at 07:35
Run Duration	103 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3470 8,730 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Memory 95.9 1-Core 100 2-Core 101 66% 99.1 Pts	4-Core 100 8-Core 101 14% 101 Pts	64-Core 100 6% 100 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 04B8) CLim: 1224 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.4.4 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Lighting 26.5 Reflection 32 Parallax 31.9 22% 30.2 fps	MRender 30.8 Gravity 24.9 Splatting 35 25% 30.2 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 22%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX3 90GB 979 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 102 5406966 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 63754494543916 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2137 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 1934 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5406966 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5406966 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5406966 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 48 48 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 18369 (EA) Unknown 0 0 21843 (F1) Unknown 0 0 21843 (F2) Unknown 0 0 24394	55.8% Above average	Read 384 Write 123 Mixed 175 50% 227 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 74.6 4K Mixed 13.8 94% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 13.2 42% 92.1 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	43.5% Average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 15.2 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 15.5 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 54.2 74% 54.2 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D-E LX Builds (Compare 493 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E LX

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	125x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	117x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	89x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	29x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	26x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	22x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x
256GB 256GBNetacBench 67%, 2,108 samples	14x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	189x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	137x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	69x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16