Asus V-P5G41E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus V-P5G41E  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '18 at 17:38
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9505-$250
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 77.1
1-Core 41
2-Core 81.6
44% 66.6 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 161
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Gigabyte(1458 22F2) 2GB; radeon rx550
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 24.20.11016.4
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 31.4
Parallax 22
15% 24 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 34.7
22% 26.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.8% Poor
Read 182
Write 107
Mixed 162
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 20.7
4K Mixed 3.8
52% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 53.2
DQ Mixed 4.43
13% 27.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 85%
Samsung HD321HJ 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 112
Write 116
Mixed 113
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.23
4K Mixed 0.43
118% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 64%
WDC WD25 00BEKT-60PVMT0 250GB
48GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 27.4
Mixed 29.3
37% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.36
64% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
22.8% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.9
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical V-P5G41E Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus V-P5G41E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback