Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics9.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '18 at 09:44
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Memory 97.4
1-Core 160
2-Core 281
101% 179 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 877
87% 712 Pts
64-Core 876
54% 876 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 872F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6094
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.02% Terrible
Lighting 9.37
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 9.44
8% 10.8 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 8.43
Splatting 18.7
12% 13.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 9.02%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 2,424
Write 1,156
Mixed 1,462
370% 1,681 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 44.7
192% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 440
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 155
172% 294 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 242%
Great: 254%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140
125GB free
Firmware: M0CR050 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 469
Write 288
Mixed 339
81% 365 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 26.2
104% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 44.4
84% 170 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE4G4D32AEEA.K8FE 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 42.2
MC Mixed 32.3
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 45.5
SC Mixed 33.8
99% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 48.8
82% 48.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,146
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback