Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive25.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '18 at 06:09
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 93.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 247
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 648
69% 551 Pts
64-Core 663
41% 663 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.1% Good
Lighting 77.1
Reflection 80.9
Parallax 70.4
63% 76.1 fps
MRender 69.5
Gravity 74.6
Splatting 76.8
61% 73.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V Series SATA SSD 120GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 312
Write 53
Mixed 76.8
32% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 18.4
4K Mixed 2.97
14% 7.21 MB/s
DQ Read 81
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 3.17
36% 81 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 71%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$83
2TB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 119
Write 152
Mixed 140
103% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 4.75
4K Mixed 0.77
205% 2.09 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78%
Great: 110%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
929GB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 111
Write 127
Mixed 105
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.22
101% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 69%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
29GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 118
Write 26
Mixed 39.8
61% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.19
4K Write 2.28
4K Mixed 0.58
124% 3.35 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
60.1% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 18.5
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 18.5
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 59.9
67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback