Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 PRO (all builds)
Memory	9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20111122
Uptime	13.3 Days
Run Date	May 23 '18 at 04:40
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Memory 91.7 1-Core 114 2-Core 226 82% 144 Pts	4-Core 436 8-Core 418 58% 427 Pts	64-Core 432 27% 432 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 2974) CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.2% Above average	Lighting 62.7 Reflection 65.7 Parallax 60 51% 62.8 fps	MRender 69.1 Gravity 58.9 Splatting 52.7 48% 60.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 194GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5382 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1032 (B1) Unknown 99 99 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 63 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 12 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8127844778	95.9% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 407 Mixed 416 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 70 4K Mixed 38.5 143% 48.6 MB/s	DQ Read 39 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 108 96% 136 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 134%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 105 11615002 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 26474178429768 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2132 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 504 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 11615002 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 11615002 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 11615002 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 7578 (EA) Unknown 0 0 9464 (F1) Unknown 0 0 9464 (F2) Unknown 0 0 8751	41.2% Average	Read 188 Write 124 Mixed 138 33% 150 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 72.7 4K Mixed 8.76 84% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 21.7 DQ Write 84.3 DQ Mixed 7.35 19% 37.8 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 61%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 860GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E5 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 71 68 8818 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 7050 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 12495 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2194 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 2 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 60 171799347223 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 7061	61.5% Good	Read 84.7 Write 129 Mixed 116 83% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.59 123% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 75%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 333GB free Firmware: JP4OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 96 (03) Spinup time 122 122 25790120245 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 6709 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 140 30 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 25307 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2315 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6910 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6910 (C2) HDA temperature 230 230 188979347482 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	65% Good	Read 116 Write 111 Mixed 115 86% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.09 4K Mixed 0.31 75% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB 48,796 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	61.2% Good	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 22.5 MC Mixed 19.9 61% 21.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 18.4 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,046 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $230

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	462x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	289x
Core i7-2600Intel $177Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	101x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	113x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	72x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	58x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	41x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	42x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	29x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $849

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $288	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16