MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33)

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	MSI MS-7A33
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33) (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180427
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 22 '18 at 19:12
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 82 1-Core 88.8 2-Core 175 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 677 61% 513 Pts	64-Core 1,254 78% 1,254 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3417) CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.4.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Lighting 72 Reflection 71.9 Parallax 91.7 59% 78.5 fps	MRender 66.1 Gravity 74.3 Splatting 57.5 53% 66 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 276GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1849 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 718 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 62 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 58 58 42213 (EB) Unknown 99 99 179 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3487748936	81.9% Excellent	Read 489 Write 270 Mixed 276 76% 345 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 56 4K Mixed 28.6 126% 41.3 MB/s	DQ Read 237 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 62.2 78% 142 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 123%
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199 10,165 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 217GB free Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 107 107 16737302 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 112 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 127122442031417 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 497 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 200 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 16737302 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 112 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 16737302 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 16737302 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 77 77 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 8630 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8275 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8275 (F2) Unknown 0 0 14173	54.2% Above average	Read 196 Write 174 Mixed 148 38% 173 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 81.8 4K Mixed 13.7 96% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 179 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 27.3 62% 128 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 66%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 150GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	211% Outstanding	Read 2,098 Write 1,247 Mixed 1,200 334% 1,515 MB/s	4K Read 49.5 4K Write 96.3 4K Mixed 26.6 160% 57.5 MB/s	DQ Read 52.5 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 23 40% 74.7 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 211% Great: 236%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$38 31,641 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 42.8 MC Write 38.7 MC Mixed 33.9 110% 38.5 GB/s	SC Read 25.4 SC Write 39.7 SC Mixed 29.5 90% 31.5 GB/s	Latency 76.8 52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33) Builds (Compare 852 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33)

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	102x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	100x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	83x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	76x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	65x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	64x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	27x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	21x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	67x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	35x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $393

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16