Dell OptiPlex 9010

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Dell OptiPlex 9010
Motherboard	Dell OptiPlex 9010 (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180222
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	May 22 '18 at 00:59
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 100 2-Core 202 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 396 53% 396 Pts	64-Core 393 24% 393 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 75%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8496) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.97% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 2.85 Parallax 1.91 2% 2.4 fps	MRender 2.81 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 2.09 2% 2.41 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.97% Great: 2%
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% EVGA(3842 6160) Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9764 Performing below potential (95^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (69 fps cap detected)	55.5% Above average	Lighting 68.3 Reflection 69.8 Parallax 62.3 56% 66.8 fps	MRender 69.6 Gravity 64.6 Splatting 68 55% 67.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 111GB free Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2001 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 821 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 56 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 241 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2998019391	60.3% Good	Read 263 Write 208 Mixed 125 44% 199 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 32.8 4K Mixed 28.4 95% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 94.7 92% 145 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 124%
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7692 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 864 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 724 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1704013 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 487 (C2) HDA temperature 98 98 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 98 (F1) Unknown 100 100 10158	72.5% Very good	Read 500 Write 339 Mixed 338 87% 392 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 30.8 4K Mixed 9.84 66% 21.6 MB/s	DQ Read 351 DQ Write 235 DQ Mixed 44.8 100% 210 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 101%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 48GB free Firmware: 18.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 199 199 31922 (03) Spinup time 138 136 4083 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7864 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 41 41 43759 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2771 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 1 35519 (BC) Unknown 100 1 5710 (BE) vendor-specific 65 53 639238179 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 600 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7263 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	55.4% Above average	Read 102 Write 90.7 Mixed 56.5 62% 83.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.36 93% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 1,000 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 375GB free, PID 231a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 71.3 Write 71.9 Mixed 37 74% 60.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 5.28 4K Mixed 0.34 193% 2 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 56%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB 970 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 354GB free, PID ab28 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Read 75.3 Write 64.1 Mixed 49.6 78% 63 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 6.45 4K Mixed 0.36 234% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 14GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.7% Above average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 15.6 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 16.3 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OptiPlex 9010 Builds (Compare 3,915 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 9010

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,862x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	775x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	677x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	471x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	362x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	161x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	82x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	58x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	97x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	88x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	74x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $288	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16