HP 810-102eo

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 810-102eo  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '16 at 13:49
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 211
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 519
56% 445 Pts
64-Core 571
35% 571 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
Device(1B0A 90D2) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.0.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 33.4
Parallax 44.8
30% 38.5 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 31.2
Splatting 39.4
28% 33.5 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 26%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
677GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 158
Mixed 156
124% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 2.28
4K Mixed 0.22
106% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB Kingston HP698650-154-KEB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.4% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 9.5
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 810-102eo Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: HP 810-102eo

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $401
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback