Asus P8C WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive83.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8C WS  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140417
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 20 '18 at 19:23
Run Duration295 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245 V2-$368
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 96.8
2-Core 186
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 468
49% 393 Pts
64-Core 475
29% 475 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 414
Write 486
Mixed 459
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 27.4
91% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 106
104% 167 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 182%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 130
Write 129
Mixed 123
96% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 0.44
116% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 72%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
722GB free
Firmware: MJAOA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 154
Write 98.8
Mixed 107
90% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.17
68% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 91%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
595GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 69.4
Write 71.2
Mixed 71.5
53% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.17
72% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 83%
LSI Logical Volume 8TB
481GB free
Firmware: 3000
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 182
Mixed 176
138% 184 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.27
90% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
Hitachi HDN726060AL 6TB
434GB free
Firmware: T517
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 134
Mixed 134
114% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.46
109% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 119%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
326GB free
Firmware: 0A80
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 204
Write 78.3
Mixed 70.4
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.14
59% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 81%
Great: 83%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180
41GB free
Firmware: 0A83
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 126
Write 122
Mixed 117
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.4
93% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71%
Great: 97%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
35GB free
Firmware: 0A82
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 236
Write 142
Mixed 117
123% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.23
92% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 109%
Great: 99%
Kingston HyperX Savage USB 3.1 64GB-$48
2GB free, PID 16b3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-023.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 16.8
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8C WS Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8C WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $507
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback