Lenovo TC-F1___

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo TC-F1___  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160524
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 14 '18 at 17:07
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770S-$95
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 203
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 384
51% 382 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3203) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.31
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.2% Below average
Lighting 44.6
Reflection 42.8
Parallax 38.5
36% 42 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 34.3
30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500418ASQ 500GB
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP24 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 94.8
Write 91.1
Mixed 31
53% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.51
112% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.3% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 19
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback