Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-K  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '18 at 09:17
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User TUN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$38
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 124
2-Core 225
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 347
46% 344 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT
Gigabyte(1458 3452) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.21% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 0.34
1% 1.38 fps
MRender 2.48
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 2.04
2% 1.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.21%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 386
Mixed 420
97% 437 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 19
121% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 17.3
81% 181 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 128%
WDC WD20 00FYYZ-01UL1B1 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 136
Write 135
Mixed 134
174% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 3.09
4K Mixed 0.51
126% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 59%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 1x4GB-$17
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
39.6% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 10.7
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 6,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback