Asus H110M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-K (all builds)
Memory	2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170704
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 14 '18 at 09:07
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	TUN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7100-$62 79,299 User benchmarks, average bench 57% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 92.4 1-Core 124 2-Core 227 85% 148 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 340 46% 343 Pts	64-Core 346 21% 346 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT 8,099 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 3452) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.26% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 2.65 Parallax 0.47 1% 1.51 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 2 2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.26% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 50 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 8 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 47 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 766106910	85.9% Excellent	Read 502 Write 391 Mixed 419 97% 437 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 90.2 4K Mixed 18.3 123% 47.6 MB/s	DQ Read 31.9 DQ Write 251 DQ Mixed 100 90% 128 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 128%
WDC WD20 00FYYZ-01UL1B1 2TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1.5TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 132 Write 138 Mixed 107 161% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 3.01 4K Mixed 0.52 123% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 1x4GB-$26 1,245 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 10.7 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 12.1 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 63.3 63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 5,967 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $89Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	1,127x
Core i5-6400Intel $75Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	644x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	556x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	846x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	473x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	369x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	314x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	166x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	156x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	113x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	80x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $176

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $258	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16