Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 12 '18 at 20:43
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 38.7
2-Core 77.8
39% 60 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 92.9
14% 101 Pts
64-Core 107
7% 107 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.3% Terrible
Lighting 7.63
Reflection 8.42
Parallax 9.84
6% 8.63 fps
MRender 7.24
Gravity 6.87
Splatting 9.04
6% 7.72 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.3%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 463
Write 189
Mixed 196
62% 283 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 6.82
51% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 49.8
DQ Mixed 4.35
24% 56.2 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 82%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
222GB free
Firmware: AM0P3M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 89.6
Write 90.2
Mixed 85.3
66% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.21
74% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 60%
WD Black 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$55
121GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 73.9
Write 69.2
Mixed 71.7
54% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.41
105% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173CB0- 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.3% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 10
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 8
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-S1 Builds (Compare 513 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $26
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback