Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '18 at 03:28
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$143
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 132
2-Core 264
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 777
80% 648 Pts
64-Core 770
48% 770 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 95%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 155
Reflection 87.8
Parallax 79.1
126% 107 fps
Gravity 77
Splatting 70
65% 73.5 fps
Poor: 53% Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 2,851
Write 1,837
Mixed 1,973
491% 2,220 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 39.5
200% 76.4 MB/s
DQ Read 53.6
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 184
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 295%
Great: 353%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB
225GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 988
Write 971
Mixed 989
220% 983 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 29.7
156% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 438
DQ Mixed 148
183% 321 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 163%
Great: 332%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16G-D4-2800-MR 1x4GB
1 of 8 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
39.2% Below average
MC Read 17
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 12.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9.8
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,886 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $884
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback