OEM H81U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardOEM H81U  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '18 at 10:56
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 76.5
2-Core 128
62% 98 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 190
25% 190 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Intel(8086 0A16) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4889
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Lighting 4.33
Reflection 4.46
Parallax 5.47
4% 4.75 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 6.52
4% 4.31 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 128GB SSD 128GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 473
Write 345
Mixed 180
73% 333 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 2.54
64% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 85.8
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 5.02
42% 94 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 89%
iODD External HDD 1TB
125GB free, PID 2028
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 91.2
Write 91.7
Mixed 10
75% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.17
59% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38%
Great: 174%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Teikon TMTS4G28DFRBFK-16K 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
33.4% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81U Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: OEM H81U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $393
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback