Asrock X99M Killer/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99M Killer/3.1  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '18 at 19:27
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 84.2
1-Core 127
2-Core 258
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 838
83% 679 Pts
64-Core 1,026
64% 1,026 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.31
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 153
Parallax 145
123% 150 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 146
Splatting 115
104% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 113%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 2,752
Write 1,845
Mixed 2,011
488% 2,202 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 32.1
162% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 88
103% 173 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 280%
Great: 353%
Toshiba THNSNJ51 512GB
85GB free
Firmware: 0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 511
Write 404
Mixed 187
81% 367 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 33.7
96% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 19.7
DQ Write 61.9
DQ Mixed 103
61% 61.5 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 100%
Lexar SD WorkflowSR1 32GB
30GB free, PID ba03
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 91.4
Write 78.9
Mixed 76.9
104% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.28
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 1.75
155% 3.39 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 38%
Lexar JumpDrive P20 USB 3.0 32GB-$23
25GB free, PID a212
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
136% Outstanding
MC Read 49.8
MC Write 66.6
MC Mixed 47
156% 54.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 18.7
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 136%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99M Killer/3.1 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Killer/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $605
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback