Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics63.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170901
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 02 '18 at 20:39
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 119
2-Core 229
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 734
68% 567 Pts
64-Core 1,329
82% 1,329 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781
CLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
63.7% Good
Lighting 82.1
Reflection 55.7
Parallax 109
67% 82.3 fps
MRender 53.8
Gravity 83
Splatting 71.7
58% 69.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial_CT2050MX300SSD1 2TB
898GB free
Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 59% Great: 99%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 504
Write 248
Mixed 183
68% 312 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 13.5
110% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 31.4
80% 169 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3334 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 48.2
MC Write 47.2
MC Mixed 41.9
131% 45.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 44.6
SC Mixed 30.8
96% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 124%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,056
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback