ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo TC-F1___

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Lenovo TC-F1___ (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO
Memory	2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 02 '18 at 19:43
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Memory 88.7 1-Core 96.3 2-Core 195 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 378 50% 378 Pts	64-Core 370 23% 370 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 308C) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.65% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.65 Parallax 1.34 1% 1.57 fps	MRender 3.29 Gravity 1.03 Splatting 3.35 2% 2.56 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.65% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 425GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC65 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 99 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 602 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 4616842374 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 20295 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 599 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 28 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 63 437780506 (C2) HDA temperature 26 40 68719476762 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 65 36 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 28823525543746 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2108894513 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2017798300	55.5% Above average	Read 96.2 Write 97.8 Mixed 12.1 50% 68.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.11 4K Write 0.57 4K Mixed 0.62 83% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 88%
WDC WD10 02FBYS-18W8B1 1TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 382GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.2% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 25.5 Mixed 17.8 30% 24.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.33 82% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
RAMAXEL RMR1870EC58E9F1333 1x4GB 1,247 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	28.8% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 8.7 26% 9.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 8.3 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback