Gigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H87-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160701
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 02 '18 at 15:30
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 92.5
1-Core 113
2-Core 209
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 591
60% 483 Pts
64-Core 539
33% 539 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Lighting 66.9
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 62.6
54% 66.4 fps
MRender 74.7
Gravity 62.9
Splatting 55.3
52% 64.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,346
Write 973
Mixed 1,062
250% 1,127 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 46.7
169% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 102
108% 180 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 175%
Great: 254%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
42GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 498
Write 3.29
Mixed 435
68% 312 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 19.2
85% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 88.7
111% 197 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 116%
Corsair Voyager GTX 128GB
8GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 416
Write 69
Mixed 213
50% 233 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 6.73
48% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 80.6
DQ Mixed 4.13
30% 71.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 57%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
146GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 151
Write 126
Mixed 121
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.26
89% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 99%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
92GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 102
Write 78.7
Mixed 75.1
64% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.16
68% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52%
Great: 83%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
43GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 107
Write 63.7
Mixed 74.9
62% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.19
67% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17.4
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H87-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback