Dell OptiPlex 9010

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	62.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Dell OptiPlex 9010
Motherboard	Dell OptiPlex 9010 (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180222
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	May 02 '18 at 02:22
Run Duration	500 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 103 2-Core 208 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 402 53% 399 Pts	64-Core 399 25% 399 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% EVGA(3842 6160) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2352 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Lighting 77.8 Reflection 78 Parallax 68.4 63% 74.7 fps	MRender 80 Gravity 71 Splatting 75.1 62% 75.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7283 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 715 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 724 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1572939 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 476 (C2) HDA temperature 98 98 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 98 (F1) Unknown 100 100 9363	72.7% Very good	Read 502 Write 338 Mixed 247 80% 362 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 29.9 4K Mixed 9.71 66% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 359 DQ Write 232 DQ Mixed 43.9 100% 212 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 101%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 23GB free Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1593 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 672 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 56 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 237 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2208985833	60.6% Good	Read 264 Write 208 Mixed 181 48% 218 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 34 4K Mixed 28.2 97% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 91.3 88% 138 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 49GB free Firmware: 18.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 199 199 31922 (03) Spinup time 138 136 4075 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7522 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 41 41 43355 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2628 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 28 1 35519 (BC) Unknown 28 1 5710 (BE) vendor-specific 67 53 588906529 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 596 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6925 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	54.7% Above average	Read 98.2 Write 92.5 Mixed 52.4 60% 81 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.38 94% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 1,000 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 715GB free, PID 231a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Read 28.1 Write 20 Mixed 16.7 26% 21.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 3.36 4K Mixed 0.31 127% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 56%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB 970 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 490GB free, PID ab28 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 66.4 Write 62.9 Mixed 45.6 73% 58.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 6.31 4K Mixed 0.33 228% 2.44 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 57%
ZOOM H1 SD R&W 2GB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 0GB free, PID 0120 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	4.87% Terrible	Read 5.03 Write 3.15 Mixed 3.89 5% 4.03 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0.93 4K Mixed 0.85 70% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 4.87% Great: 4%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 12GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	58.6% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 17.9 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 18.2 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OptiPlex 9010 Builds (Compare 3,898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 9010

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,847x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	774x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	677x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	471x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	361x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	360x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	161x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	82x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	57x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	97x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	88x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	72x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16