Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	9.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171204
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '18 at 19:19
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 72.7 1-Core 77.3 2-Core 158 60% 103 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 647 57% 485 Pts	64-Core 1,306 81% 1,306 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P400 5,817 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Nvidia(10DE 11BE) 2GB CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.16 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	9.33% Terrible	Lighting 12.5 Reflection 10.6 Parallax 9.31 10% 10.8 fps	MRender 0.05 Gravity 10.1 Splatting 15.2 8% 8.46 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.33% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84 8,513 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 13409 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3085 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 242 (AE) Unknown 100 100 977 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 806 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1070 (F1) Unknown 100 100 29058061617 (F2) Unknown 100 100 25214485336	30.8% Below average	Read 452 Write 32 Mixed 67.8 39% 184 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 8.81 4K Mixed 4.87 34% 9.72 MB/s	DQ Read 32.4 DQ Write 8.84 DQ Mixed 2.8 7% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 212GB free Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 197839439 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3494 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 58 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 17532685 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 5122 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 37 3606 (B7) Unknown 98 98 2 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 97 97 3 (BE) vendor-specific 71 54 488177693 (C2) HDA temperature 29 46 55834574877 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 30 24 197839439 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 66468913883724 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3205452113 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2536209782	63.3% Good	Read 113 Write 108 Mixed 104 82% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.38 94% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42 105,447 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	43.4% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 13.3 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 14.9 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 95.2 42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	420x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $636

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)