Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H77M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130731
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateApr 29 '18 at 13:26
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 100
2-Core 205
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 511
56% 441 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600
Nvidia(10DE 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.85% Terrible
Lighting 4.33
Reflection 4
Parallax 4.22
4% 4.18 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 3.83
Splatting 6.96
4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.85%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 148
Write 154
Mixed 145
112% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.25
85% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
236GB free
Firmware: KC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 106
Write 121
Mixed 88.1
79% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.57
105% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 13.3
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 13.6
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H77M-D3H Builds (Compare 1,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $424
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback