bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics4.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardParallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory1.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20170626
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 28 '18 at 17:31
Run Duration701 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4258U
CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Memory 18.9
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 140
40% 78.4 Pts
4-Core 84.9
8-Core 91.7
12% 88.3 Pts
64-Core 99.7
6% 99.7 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM)
ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 256MB
Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 12.2.41615.0
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
4.9% Terrible
Lighting 5.67
Reflection 3.58
Parallax 6.06
5% 5.1 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 3.43
Splatting 9.65
6% 6.25 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 4.9%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Windows 8-1 69GB
64GB free
Firmware: F.KH2WJW Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Windows 8-0 69GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: F.QTA9XM Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
USB DRIVE 1GB
1GB free, PID 0111
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
2.69% Terrible
Read 7.98
Write 1.53
Mixed 2.45
4% 3.99 MB/s
4K Read 2.51
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.19
22% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.69%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
667, 667 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.2% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 6.7
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 0.2
SC Mixed 0.2
0% 0.17 GB/s
Latency 329
12% 329 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback