HP 500-141ea

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 500-141ea  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory1.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131003
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 28 '18 at 14:49
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 78
1-Core 67.6
2-Core 129
56% 91.6 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 203
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 203
12% 203 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8570D + HD 7000 Dual Graphics
MSI(1462 B498) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
4.78% Terrible
Lighting 5.53
Reflection 8.12
Parallax 5
4% 6.22 fps
MRender 5.33
Gravity 4.27
Splatting 8.83
5% 6.14 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.78%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
870GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 149
Mixed 147
117% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.2
85% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
849GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 147
Write 159
Mixed 126
108% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.13
4K Write 2.76
4K Mixed 0.34
136% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27% Poor
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 8.6
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-141ea Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-141ea

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback