Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics63.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '18 at 03:15
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 92.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 219
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 586
64% 505 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.4% Good
Lighting 80
Reflection 80.9
Parallax 69.8
65% 76.9 fps
MRender 70.4
Gravity 72.5
Splatting 75.3
60% 72.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC400 128GB-$75
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.Y Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 517
Write 318
Mixed 371
89% 402 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 11.1
101% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 10.5
78% 181 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 106%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
860GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 140
Write 138
Mixed 119
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.21
84% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 84%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
466GB free
Firmware: SC13 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 110
Write 90.6
Mixed 90
73% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.49
111% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 60%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
465GB free
Firmware: SC13 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 112
Write 96.3
Mixed 94.4
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.37
96% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 60%
Seagate Expansion 500GB
414GB free
Firmware: 0637
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 29.8
Mixed 38.8
27% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.22
4K Write 0.65
4K Mixed 0.16
39% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
378GB free
Firmware: GR2OA3E0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 92.6
Write 95.9
Mixed 88.9
70% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.16
67% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 58%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
74GB free
Firmware: 10.01E04 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 56.1
Write 58
Mixed 56.3
43% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.5
111% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 0118 4GBH1X04JACC31-165 0118 4GBH1X04JACC31-165 16GB
1600, 1867, 1867 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.8
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 20.1
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback