Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 25 '18 at 22:23
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 204
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 646
65% 525 Pts
64-Core 851
53% 851 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 3690) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 13.3
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 12.5
11% 13.7 fps
MRender 19
Gravity 13.3
Splatting 17.4
14% 16.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480 GB 480GB
153GB free
Firmware: UG3000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 515
Write 318
Mixed 402
91% 412 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 3.79
46% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 50.9
DQ Mixed 5.98
14% 27.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 57%
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE3000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 506
Write 87.2
Mixed 121
51% 238 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 4.59
52% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 51.9
DQ Write 22.3
DQ Mixed 3.59
12% 25.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 55%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
812GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
68% Good
Read 118
Write 119
Mixed 117
89% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.34
86% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68%
Great: 74%
OCZ ATV 8GB
3GB free, PID ac02
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 34.2
Write 9.42
Mixed 15
21% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.03
48% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD824A.C16FHP 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 28.5
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 25.6
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $69

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $345
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $139Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback