Dell Precision Tower 7810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7810  (all builds)
Memory92.1 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '18 at 13:33
Run Duration86 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 69.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 222
73% 133 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 690
65% 540 Pts
64-Core 1,960
121% 1,960 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 26.9
Parallax 34.1
21% 28.9 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 30.4
Splatting 27.1
26% 32.1 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vector 150 480GB-$389
258GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 514
Write 487
Mixed 495
111% 499 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 22.3
79% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 19
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 12.2
49% 99.9 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 M393A2G40DB0-CPB 96GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.7% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 36.9
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7810 Builds (Compare 1,748 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback