Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150211
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateApr 21 '18 at 06:08
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 196
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 588
60% 483 Pts
64-Core 752
46% 752 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$123
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 524
Write 490
Mixed 491
112% 502 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 36
146% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 111
125% 211 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 145
Write 113
Mixed 80.6
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 4.52
4K Write 0.86
4K Mixed 0.57
268% 1.98 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 3x4GB
3 of 8 slots used
12GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 29.1
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 18.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $502
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback