Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemGigabyte H110M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '18 at 14:03
Run Duration325 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4620-$37
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 93.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 221
83% 144 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 330
44% 330 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4590
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.67% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 6.62
6% 8.19 fps
MRender 7.48
Gravity 5.67
Splatting 15.3
8% 9.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.67%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AA
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 60.5
Write 60.8
Mixed 54.2
44% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.38
84% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 42%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
1GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
5.34% Terrible
Read 23.9
Write 3.52
Mixed 6.39
11% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.41
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
18% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.34%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R744G2133U1S 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.2% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback