Notebook W65_67SJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemNotebook W65_67SJ  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65_67SJ
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140825
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateApr 20 '18 at 12:31
Run Duration85 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$44
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 198
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 496
52% 417 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 850M
Clevo(1558 6501) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 17
17% 18 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 15.5
14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
753GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0OA560 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 101
Write 99
Mixed 93.3
74% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.19
66% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
BKH800SO51208-1600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17.2
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.9
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W65_67SJ Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65_67SJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback