Notebook W65_67SJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 59% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemNotebook W65_67SJ  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65_67SJ
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140825
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateApr 20 '18 at 12:22
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$44
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 44.2
2-Core 83.4
44% 67.3 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 211
22% 179 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 850M
Clevo(1558 6501) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 17
8% 12.9 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 15.5
14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
753GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0OA560 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 102
Write 98.2
Mixed 93.8
74% 98 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.17
67% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
BKH800SO51208-1600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.5
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W65_67SJ Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65_67SJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback