Gigabyte GA-G1.Guerrilla

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.Guerrilla  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111212
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 18 '18 at 21:41
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 960-$220
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 80.2
2-Core 161
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 380
40% 317 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Gigabyte(1458 2261) 3GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
41.8% Average
Lighting 54.9
Reflection 36.1
Parallax 67.8
45% 52.9 fps
MRender 33.7
Gravity 53
Splatting 45
36% 43.9 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 367
Write 208
Mixed 137
52% 238 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 12
78% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 25.7
DQ Write 87.7
DQ Mixed 12
22% 41.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 85%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
558GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 130
Write 136
Mixed 78
85% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.08
4K Write 3.26
4K Mixed 0.55
167% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
40% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 15.6
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 11
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G1.Guerrilla Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Guerrilla

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback