Gigabyte GA-G1.Guerrilla

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.Guerrilla  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '18 at 22:16
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 960-$220
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 96.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 210
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 529
58% 462 Pts
64-Core 528
33% 528 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Gigabyte(1458 2261) 3GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.3.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
41.1% Average
Lighting 53.7
Reflection 35.7
Parallax 67.5
44% 52.3 fps
MRender 33.9
Gravity 52.3
Splatting 44.4
36% 43.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 355
Write 175
Mixed 79.8
44% 203 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 12.8
91% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 28.5
DQ Write 89.2
DQ Mixed 12.7
23% 43.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 85%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
364GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 142
Write 117
Mixed 79.3
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 3.17
4K Mixed 0.54
151% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 19.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 15.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 53.4
75% 53.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 56%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G1.Guerrilla Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Guerrilla

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback