HP EliteBook 850 G1

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook 850 G1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 198F
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140903
Uptime	6.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '18 at 17:41
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4600U 26,548 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Memory 57.2 1-Core 70.4 2-Core 100 46% 75.9 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 155 24% 173 Pts	64-Core 193 12% 193 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 198F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4139 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	2.95% Terrible	Lighting 2.83 Reflection 5 Parallax 4.31 2% 4.05 fps	MRender 6.81 Gravity 2.03 Splatting 6.22 4% 5.02 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.95% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 284 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 290GB free Firmware: EMT2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1922 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1194 (B1) Unknown 99 99 6 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 47 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 26 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7377929319	59.5% Above average	Read 241 Write 186 Mixed 209 47% 212 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 51.7 4K Mixed 19.9 104% 35.1 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 85.9 89% 146 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 126%
SanDisk X210 512GB-$152 1,667 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: X210 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 4224 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4408 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 128857538561 (AE) Unknown 100 100 32 (B7) Unknown 253 253 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 20 (BE) vendor-specific 60 46 40 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	70.8% Very good	Read 400 Write 220 Mixed 237 63% 286 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 75.4 4K Mixed 18.8 108% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 269 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 44.1 80% 161 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1315 CT102464BF160B.M16 16GB 141 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	46.4% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 17 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 8.6 26% 9.1 GB/s	Latency 136 29% 136 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 850 G1 Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 850 G1

CPU
Core i7-4600UIntelBench 49%, 26,548 samples	24x
Core i5-4300UIntelBench 44%, 36,631 samples	13x
Core i5-4210UIntelBench 41%, 82,966 samples	5x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	44x
Radeon HD 8750MAMDBench 6%, 409 samples	2x
Radeon HD 8500M/8700MAMDBench 6%, 604 samples	2x

SSD
SSD0240S00 240GBBench 56%, 386 samples	5x
SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GBIntel $209Bench 69%, 7,834 samples	4x
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	2x

RAM
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 27%, 14,954 samples	3x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,529 samples	3x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16