Asus Rampage III GENE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive60% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Rampage III GENE  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110920
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 16 '18 at 18:01
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 95.6
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 178
73% 122 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 455
48% 385 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR010 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
60% Above average
Read 379
Write 199
Mixed 244
60% 274 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 20.3
103% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 36.1
DQ Write 64.9
DQ Mixed 14.6
21% 38.5 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 60%
Great: 123%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
198GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 94.3
Write 91.9
Mixed 84.3
68% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.23
84% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 59%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
64GB free
Firmware: 10.01E04 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 68.5
Write 69.1
Mixed 33.8
42% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 2.39
4K Mixed 0.58
143% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 33%
FUJITSU MHZ2250BH G2 250GB
166GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 37.1
Mixed 33.8
46% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.23
62% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 55.3
72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 42%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage III GENE Builds (Compare 307 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus Rampage III GENE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $211
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback