ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 429143M

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Lenovo 429143M (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 429143M
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150514
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '18 at 08:18
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34 45,308 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Memory 84.5 1-Core 83.4 2-Core 138 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 202 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 203 12% 203 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21DA) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.23% Terrible	Lighting 2.47 Reflection 3.73 Parallax 1.66 2% 2.62 fps	MRender 3.38 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 4.57 3% 3.09 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.23% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PA128HMCD-010 128GB 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: AXM08L1Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3586 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1504 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 98 98 41 (B2) Unknown 85 85 304 (B3) Unknown 85 85 596 (B4) Unknown 85 85 3436 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 51 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (E9) Unknown 199 199 30 (EA) Unknown 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 210 (EC) Unknown 99 99 142 (ED) Unknown 99 99 275 (EE) Unknown 99 99 596	38.1% Below average	Read 247 Write 237 Mixed 175 49% 220 MB/s	4K Read 9.91 4K Write 26.9 4K Mixed 8.25 40% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 49 DQ Write 34.5 DQ Mixed 7.5 15% 30.4 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 51%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB 18,040 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2TB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 27.9 Write 19.7 Mixed 20.3 28% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.24 69% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G4M1 8GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	51.4% Above average	MC Read 18 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 17 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 15.5 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback