Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	66.1% Good	Memory 87.9 1-Core 78.2 2-Core 134 62% 100 Pts	4-Core 241 8-Core 354 37% 297 Pts	64-Core 390 24% 390 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440 14,286 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	3.86% Terrible	Lighting 4.57 Reflection 5.27 Parallax 3.34 4% 4.39 fps	MRender 7.29 Gravity 5.07 Splatting 3.52 4% 5.29 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.86% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 19298 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 845 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 70 70 1060 (B2) Unknown 94 94 116 (B3) Unknown 94 94 224 (B4) Unknown 94 94 3808 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 14 (E8) Unknown 94 94 1900 (F1) Unknown 99 99 38051900417 (F2) Unknown 99 99 30491391853	48% Average	Read 250 Write 168 Mixed 214 47% 211 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 53.4 4K Mixed 18.4 73% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 58.3 DQ Mixed 49 55% 97.3 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 76%
Mass Storage Device 320GB 2,915 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 50GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 31 Write 27.7 Mixed 28.9 37% 29.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.26 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.25 68% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 0198 99U5471-003.A00LF 80AD HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 04CB 7GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 1024 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.4% Below average	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 9.7 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 10.3 28% 9.93 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 36%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	8x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	7x
GeForce GT 420NvidiaBench 2%, 9,903 samples	5x

RAM
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 80AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 80AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 80AD HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 16GBUnknownBench 40%, 3 samples	3x
HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 80CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 80AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 80CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GBUnknownBench 34%, 6 samples	3x
HP698650-154-KEB 4x4GBUnknownBench 45%, 7 samples	3x

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $139

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16